Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus KGP(M)E-D16 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory	57 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130219
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '16 at 13:12
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6344 24 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 79.9 1-Core 53.3 2-Core 113 52% 82 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 387 36% 297 Pts	64-Core 895 55% 895 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780 4GB 988 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gainward(10B0 1007) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6869 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.3% Average	Lighting 54.1 Reflection 49.4 Parallax 63.4 44% 55.7 fps	MRender 64.6 Gravity 45 Splatting 46.1 42% 51.9 fps
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2844 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 690 (B1) Unknown 98 98 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 63 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 59 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13482408929	46% Average	Read 251 Write 162 Mixed 173 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 18.4 70% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 78.4 DQ Mixed 36.8 44% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 118%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 385GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 168 6100 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1018 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2754 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 671 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 36 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 189 189 35075 (C2) HDA temperature 123 113 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	52.5% Above average	Read 105 Write 77.7 Mixed 78.8 65% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.24 88% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 176GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 162 2325 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1004 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2542 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 606 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 31 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 972 (C2) HDA temperature 115 107 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.2% Good	Read 114 Write 113 Mixed 97.1 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.33 103% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 78GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 172 2175 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 322 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 531 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 167 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 319 (C2) HDA temperature 116 108 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.7% Good	Read 107 Write 104 Mixed 102 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.23 93% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-055.A00LF 8x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.4% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 14.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16