Asus X555DG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X555DG  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555DG
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150910
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJan 27 '19 at 05:45
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 40.1
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 76.4
32% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 132
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Asus(1043 1B8D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2501.0
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 6.66
4% 5.87 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-128G-1006 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 86 88 88 84 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 354
Write 333
Mixed 229
SusWrite 91.8
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 28.6
102% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 37.8
36% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 91%
HGST HUS 724020ALA640 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 157 158 158 159 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.8% Good
Read 157
Write 158
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 158
188% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555DG Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555DG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback