Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 7,922 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 54.2 2-Core 90.5 40% 65.2 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 137 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 138 9% 138 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 3,679 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1B8D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	5.22% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 9.38 Parallax 10.4 5% 8.66 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 8.83 Splatting 6.87 6% 6.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.22% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2832 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1498 (B1) Unknown 96 96 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 44 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 65 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7339250377
Poor: 63% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 6.9 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 21%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 30%, 7,922 samples	28x
FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8GAMDBench 36%, 2,236 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	21x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	19x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,569 samples	7x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 8GBHynixBench 18%, 886 samples	23x
HMT451S6DFR8A-PB Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 8GBHynixBench 18%, 242 samples	6x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G4E1 12GBSamsungBench 19%, 146 samples	5x