PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z97-PRO GAMER (all builds) |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150407 |
Uptime | 2.3 Days |
Run Date | Jan 19 '19 at 21:12 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 56% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 63 37 64 52 47 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
57.1%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 1,399x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 542x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 293x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 454x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 220x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 181x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $648 |