Acer Predator G6-710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G6-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G6-710
Memory31.6 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 21:14
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 166
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 702
62% 529 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 93.7
Reflection 104
Parallax 97.1
76% 98.1 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 90.3
Splatting 94.2
76% 92.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 383 314 245 324 313 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,355
Write 1,439
Mixed 947
SusWrite 326
279% 1,267 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 78.1
268% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 886
DQ Mixed 944
701% 926 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 238%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
377GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 447 462 460 462 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 465
Mixed 434
SusWrite 427
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.6
193% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 357
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Ngff to USB3.0 1153E 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 336 338 337 336 339 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 381
Write 337
Mixed 290
SusWrite 336
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 25.6
83% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 126
98% 133 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
312GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 20 17 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Read 4
Write 23.5
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 19.1
9% 12 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV16GX4M1A2400C16 0215 CMV16GX4M1A2400C16 1315 CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G6-710 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Acer Predator G6-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback