Today's hottest deals

Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '16 at 15:18
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 126
54% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 207
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2401.1002
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 5.27
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 9.38
4% 7.12 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 6.83
Splatting 5.57
4% 5.24 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
238GB free
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,457
Write 1,209
Mixed 1,290
294% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 28.2
164% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 99.8
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 27.5
55% 108 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 187%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 505
Write 392
Mixed 411
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 37.3
142% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 37.7
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 20.2
24% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90%
Great: 124%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$149
5.5TB free
Firmware: AR15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 153
Write 117
Mixed 104
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.01
4K Mixed 0.21
207% 2.84 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
804GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 141
Mixed 124
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 3.99
4K Mixed 0.41
146% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
675GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 64
Write 83.1
Mixed 76
56% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.49
109% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
379GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 99.6
Write 124
Mixed 81.2
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.36
87% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
SAMSUNG HN-M101MBB 1TB
443GB free, PID fc74
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 31.5
Mixed 32.5
42% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.33
32% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback