HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81FA
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 09 '19 at 15:46
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 69.3
38% 56.8 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 120
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 81FA) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 5.97
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 8.25
5% 7.78 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 8.26
6% 6.96 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 305 310 301 309 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 377
Write 335
Mixed 328
SusWrite 303
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 41.1
132% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 158
120% 160 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion 240GB
74GB free
Firmware: 0636
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 11 0 11 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 32.1
Mixed 35
SusWrite 11.9
22% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 5.1
863% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 33%
WDC WD12 00BEVS-22UST0 120GB
43GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 23 27 24 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 23.3
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 22.6
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 13.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback