PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Notebook (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 81FA |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161228 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jan 09 '19 at 15:46 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
CPU Throttled | 83% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
|
41.8%
Average
|
38% 56.8 Pts
|
16% 120 Pts
|
7% 114 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 81FA) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
5.19%
Terrible
|
5% 7.78 fps
|
6% 6.96 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 305 310 301 309 315 MB/s
|
82.3%
Excellent
|
76% 336 MB/s
|
132% 43.4 MB/s
|
120% 160 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Expansion 240GB
74GB free
Firmware: 0636
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 11 0 11 16 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
22% 28.7 MB/s
|
863% 4.17 MB/s
|
|
![]() WDC WD12 00BEVS-22UST0 120GB
43GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 23 27 24 22 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
32% 23.9 MB/s
|
80% 0.93 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.7%
Below average
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
34% 118 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples | 1,155x |
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples | 1,040x |
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples | 1,002x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples | 2,525x |
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples | 1,766x |
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples | 1,192x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |