Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-553

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-553  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Wasp_BR
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 11:03
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 95.6
44% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 149
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Acer(1025 109F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.04.02
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 5.6
3% 5.8 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 183 189 184 189 191 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
Read 339
Write 193
Mixed 208
SusWrite 187
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 25
96% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 118
110% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
647GB free
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 96 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 95
Write 95.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 96.3
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0x5D07 GR2666S464L19S/8G Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 12GB
1200, 1067 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-553 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-553

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback