Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '19 at 17:57
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 493
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1557) 1GB
CLim: 981 MHz, MLim: 1128 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 10.2
10% 11.9 fps
MRender 16.8
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 16.1
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 9%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 286 281 277 282 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 332
Write 340
Mixed 285
SusWrite 286
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 35.7
116% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 39.2
82% 167 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
351GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 96 94 99 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 96.1
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 60%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86
749GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 69 71 68 74 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 54
Write 115
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 71.1
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 116 116 108 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 79.3
Write 101
Mixed 55
SusWrite 114
122% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
167% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
318GB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 74.7
Write 106
Mixed 60
SusWrite 102
120% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 0.7
402% 4.03 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 0.9
440% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.4 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 7.3
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 7.9
12% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.7
178% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 13%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
184GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.35% Terrible
Read 37.3
Write 36.3
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 7.1
31% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.35%
Great: 18%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 1TB
90GB free, PID 7410
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.9 7.3 7 7.1 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.17% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 18.5
Mixed 14
SusWrite 7
18% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.17%
Great: 20%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 1TB
22GB free, PID 7410
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 5 4.8 4.7 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Read 12
Write 20.8
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 4.9
23% 16 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 20%
ST350083 0AS 500GB
351GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 16.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 7.2
27% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 19%
ASMT 2105 3TB
639GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 129 129 126 131 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 111
Write 61
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 126
121% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 58%
ASMT 2105 1TB
17GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 108 110 113 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 133
Write 44.3
Mixed 68
SusWrite 110
111% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
136% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 79%
Seagate Portable 750GB
290GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 3.9 4 3.8 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.84% Terrible
Read 36.8
Write 25
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 4
26% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.84%
Great: 17%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
236GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.1 4.1 4 3.9 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 36
Write 34.8
Mixed 26
SusWrite 4.1
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 029E CMX32GX3M4A1600C11 859B CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 029E CMX32GX3M4A1600C11 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO/THUNDERBOLT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $386
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback