Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F
Memory186.4 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 29 '18 at 18:43
Run Duration411 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 688
62% 520 Pts
64-Core 1761
109% 1761 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 107
Parallax 90.6
86% 101 fps
MRender 94.1
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 95.6
78% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 512GB-$179
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126KB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 395 396 396 397 397 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 479
Write 430
Mixed 309
SusWrite 393
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 31.6
105% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 32.5
80% 165 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 105%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
238GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 404 405 403 403 403 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 449
Write 332
Mixed 372
SusWrite 401
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 33.6
111% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 161
109% 126 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 116%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
2TB free
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1674 1414 1415 1417 1417 1413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,821
Write 1737
Mixed 1,589
SusWrite 1,458
372% 1,651 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 45.6
161% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 420
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 46.6
140% 301 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 231%
Great: 335%
Zotac Sonix NVMe PCIe 480GB-$797
431GB free
Firmware: E7FM01.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 1325 1323 1331 1193 986 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 900
Write 1,350
Mixed 721
SusWrite 1176
235% 1,037 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 33
115% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 33.9
32% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 146%
Great: 244%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
309GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 18
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 27.5
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 60%
WDC WD40 00F9YZ-09N20L1 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 1.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 116
SusWrite 0.2
131% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31%
Great: 68%
WDC WD50 01F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 166
Write 239
Mixed 138
238% 181 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
170% 3 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 72%
ST2000DX 001-1CM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 195
Write 118
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 107
158% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.6
244% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 81%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
424GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 22.3
106% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 71%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 120
Mixed 92
142% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 0.9
398% 4.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1
403% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 92%
WDC WD20 03FYYS-02W0B1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 108 108 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 107
147% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
140% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A- M393B2G70... 192GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 31
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.3
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback