Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F
Memory186.3 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 04 '18 at 20:09
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 191
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 683
61% 515 Pts
64-Core 1,759
109% 1,759 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 111
Parallax 94
90% 105 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 91.7
Splatting 96.4
77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 264 424 417 416 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 478
Write 460
Mixed 306
SusWrite 364
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 31.3
104% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 63.9
DQ Mixed 32.8
28% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76%
Great: 116%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
499GB free
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1443 1415 1417 1415 1413 1418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,844
Write 1,786
Mixed 1,592
SusWrite 1,420
374% 1,661 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 45.4
162% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 465
338% 436 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 229%
Great: 335%
Zotac Sonix NVMe PCIe 480GB-$797
416GB free
Firmware: E7FM01.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 601 1075 1096 1217 1082 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 963
Write 1,312
Mixed 714
SusWrite 942
222% 983 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 34
124% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 524
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 32.3
169% 380 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 159%
Great: 244%
WD Se 4TB-$177
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 82 78 82 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 81.2
Write 161
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 81.3
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 100%
WD WD5001F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 146
Mixed 86.8
88% 116 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
342% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 125%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 181 186 179 185 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 81
Write 124
Mixed 32
SusWrite 184
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 2
363% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
425GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 82 78 82 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 93.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 81.3
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
3.5TB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 82 78 82 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD Re 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 92
SusWrite 80.5
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A M393B2G70BH0- Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A- M393B2G70... 192GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 30.2
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback