Lenovo 10132

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10132  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130904
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 12:24
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 173
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 274
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 367D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 4.41
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.78
5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 29 20 24 33 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 452
Write 358
Mixed 362
SusWrite 84.3
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 1
86% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 75.6
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 1.1
12% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate USB 500GB
16GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 17 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 17.3
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 16.4
16% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14%
Great: 59%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 1TB
596GB free, PID 3000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 31.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 17.4
35% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 18%
ezDISK EZ0330 External 1TB
653GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 18 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 35.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 18.6
39% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 71%
Initio MHS2030AT 30GB
3GB free, PID 1040
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 15 15 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.14% Terrible
Read 14.6
Write 13.6
Mixed 11.1
SusWrite 14.6
18% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 1315 CT51264BA1339.C16F 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10132 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback