Apple iMac12,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac12,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-942B59F58194171B
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '16 at 01:37
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 82
2-Core 166
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 302
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970M
Apple(106B 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 12.7
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 10
Splatting 15.2
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate USB 500GB
51GB free
Firmware: 050B
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 25.7
Mixed 25.9
20% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.35
82% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac12,2 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac12,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $324
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback