Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091215
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 11:00
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 141
59% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 249
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 77.5
52% 69 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 53
48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 149 165 172 171 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 232
Write 217
Mixed 204
SusWrite 160
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 22
74% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 42.5
36% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 156 156 158 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 155
Write 140
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 157
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
206GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 125 128 129 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 12.7
Write 17
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 126
33% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
193% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 114%
ASMT 2105 500GB
290GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 137
Write 96.3
Mixed 113
SusWrite 43.8
124% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 14.8
1,052% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 23
DQ Mixed 18.9
1,490% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%
ASMT 2105 320GB
207GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.8
Write 85.5
Mixed 51.2
92% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 43%
ASMT 2105 3TB
829GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 135
Write 95
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 43.9
104% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback