Asus N55SL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus N55SL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N55SL
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 11:49
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 88.4
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 98.6
54% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 165
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Asus(1043 212B) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 7.08
Parallax 1.56
2% 3.67 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 4.35
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 410 373 269 276 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 410
Write 416
Mixed 362
SusWrite 331
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 24.5
81% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 283
217% 296 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 104%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
340GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 42 52 51 54 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.6% Poor
Read 70.2
Write 72.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 49
82% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 46%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 49 56 52 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 66.2
Write 75
Mixed 43
SusWrite 53.6
80% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N55SL Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N55SL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback