Alienware ASM100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware ASM100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 03V3TG
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140820
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJun 20 '16 at 05:43
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4765T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 70
2-Core 118
56% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 328
32% 263 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GPU
Dell(1028 066A) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 16
Parallax 18.3
17% 18.5 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 15.8
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 495
Write 336
Mixed 339
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 9.39
68% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 8.72
69% 164 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 101%
WD Passport X 107D 2TB
207GB free, PID 107d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 49.6
Write 54.2
Mixed 44
64% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.13
34% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 45%
FLASH Drive SM_USB20 4GB
3GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 5.72
Mixed 7.71
11% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 6.16
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.006
23% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASM100 Builds (Compare 545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware ASM100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback