Asus P8H61-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 15:32
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 146
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 218
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
PNY(196E 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 40.9
Parallax 37.3
36% 40.7 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 38
Splatting 33
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 91 112 120 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 347
Write 136
Mixed 151
SusWrite 111
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 21.2
91% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 57.8
76% 141 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 176 191 193 193 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 150
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 190
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Terra USThree PRO 64GB
15GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 28 28 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 25.6
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 27.3
37% 28 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
90% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M EVO Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback