Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory43.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 13:32
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 179
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 658
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
Nvidia(10DE 1066) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.8% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 78.9
51% 68.2 fps
MRender 74.7
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 46.5
50% 63.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 162 166 163 170 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 177
Mixed 107
SusWrite 164
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.6
338% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 117%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 104 106 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 104
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 100%
WD My Book 25DA 8TB
3TB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 131 135 130 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 152
Write 163
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 133
173% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 67%
WD My Book 25DA 8TB
1TB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 125 128 126 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 146
Write 157
Mixed 67
SusWrite 124
164% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 67%
LaCie P9230 4TB
567GB free, PID 106e
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 99 96 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 92
Write 69.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 97.1
107% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 63%
OEM Ext Hard Disk 2TB
217GB free, PID 0070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 72 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 87
Write 29.8
Mixed 38
SusWrite 77.8
73% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 11.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback