Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory38.9 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime29.8 Days
Run DateNov 09 '18 at 17:54
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 154
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 590
54% 453 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 110
Parallax 92.9
91% 105 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 101
Splatting 101
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 198GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 292 284 280 285 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 344
Write 389
Mixed 354
SusWrite 298
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 16.3
50% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 122
92% 122 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
20GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 47 47 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 47
Write 46.7
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 35.7
32% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 148 143 151 154 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 108
Write 114
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 136
71% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.7
232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 94%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
933GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1100 1166 88 88 95 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
872GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 128 127 125 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 130
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 127
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 130GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 18.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback