Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory92.1 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 12:55
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 154
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 588
53% 444 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V5900 (FireGL V)
HP(103C 2B06) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 124 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.6% Poor
Read 104
Write 85.8
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 123
22% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 8.5
34% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 13.3
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
284GB free
Firmware: BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 66 67 67 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 65.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 66.3
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 130GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 20.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback