Apple iMac11,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac11,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F2238AC8
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 31 '18 at 07:47
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 136
56% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 197
27% 198 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Apple(106B 00D2) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 5.03
5% 6.01 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 6.13
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 83 90 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 113
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 85
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 112%
TrekStor DS pocket light 1TB
777GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 19.7
Mixed 15
SusWrite 22.6
28% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 12.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac11,2 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac11,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback