Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Compaq 2510p Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 2510p Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30C9
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit barev, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080216
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 29 '16 at 13:14
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U7600 111 User benchmarks, average bench 28% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Memory 57.6 1-Core 12.1 2-Core 22.6 24% 30.8 Pts	4-Core 23 8-Core 23.1 3% 23 Pts	64-Core 19.2 1% 19.2 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 30C9) 384MB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.19% Terrible	Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.17 fps	MRender 0.14 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 0.26 0% 0.21 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.19% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK8009GAH 80GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: BS021C Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1787 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5970 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 9670 (0A) Spinup retry count 219 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3579 (BB) vendor-specific 64 64 36 (BC) Unknown 100 98 7 (BE) vendor-specific 46 23 908787766 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1111 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6291552 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 62 62 383022 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 330713268278 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8356 (DE) Loaded hours 83 83 7014 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 290 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	13% Very poor	Read 21.4 Write 23.8 Mixed 21 17% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.76 4K Mixed 0.2 52% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.79% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 1.97 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.79% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback