Asrock H55M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H55M  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '16 at 00:47
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 661-$80
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 147
59% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 209
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.59 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
324GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 60.9
Write 46.1
Mixed 22.9
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.29
81% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 49%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD24 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 93.4
Mixed 76.4
66% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.25
72% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Cruzer Colors+ 2GB
1GB free, PID 5170
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 5.65
Mixed 9.5
14% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.35
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.006
20% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H55M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback