Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '18 at 16:30
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 228 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 736 72% 593 Pts	64-Core 913 56% 913 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 302 297 285 287 284 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 471 Mixed 283 SusWrite 295 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 43 152% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 207 194% 302 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 753GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 190 192 194 194 195 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 133 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 193 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 199GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 98 110 122 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 67.8 Write 68.2 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 114 54% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 77%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1.5TB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 41 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 39 Write 37.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 40.4 50% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 45.2 MC Write 41.8 MC Mixed 36.2 117% 41.1 GB/s	SC Read 27.3 SC Write 41.8 SC Mixed 32.2 96% 33.8 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	887x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	632x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	463x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	286x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	254x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	242x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	157x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	107x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	106x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	223x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	218x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $451

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16