Asus Z87-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z87-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '18 at 11:24
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 206
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 608
62% 502 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 372B) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 32.6
30% 32 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 33.3
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 121 90 91 63 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 361
Write 256
Mixed 278
SusWrite 117
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 33.8
130% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 164
132% 184 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 89%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
332GB free
Firmware: LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 94 95 97 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 95.3
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
186GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 59.5
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 61.1
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
250GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Read 34.3
Write 5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 2.7
11% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 42%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
333GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 67 69 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 73.3
Write 67.3
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 68.4
82% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 30%
ST325041 0AS 250GB
88GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 37.6
Write 26.8
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 21.6
37% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 38%
WD Elements 500GB
129GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 81 81 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 51.6
Write 53.1
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 80.8
77% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1979 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 23.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-DELUXE Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-DELUXE - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback