HP ENVY TS 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ENVY TS 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1965
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141120
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '16 at 04:37
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 480
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1965) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4380
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 6.06
3% 5.33 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.26
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
437GB free
Firmware: 0117
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 125
Write 119
Mixed 81.8
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.42
95% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 87%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
403GB free
Firmware: 0117
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 143
Write 151
Mixed 107
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.46
126% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
266GB free
Firmware: 0117
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 109
Write 117
Mixed 115
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.31
83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
108GB free
Firmware: 0502
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 62.4
Mixed 59.2
45% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.23
69% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 66%
Innostor Ext. HDD 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69% Good
Read 172
Write 178
Mixed 140
208% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.54
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%
ORIC0 8628US3-C 3TB
655GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 188
Write 182
Mixed 103
194% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.24
77% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 70%
ORIC0 8628US3-C 3TB
597GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 101
Write 113
Mixed 70.9
121% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.44
4K Mixed 0.43
270% 2.82 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 70%
ORIC0 8628US3-C 2TB
356GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 180
Write 165
Mixed 17.6
137% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.21
63% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 66%
ORIC0 8628US3-C 2TB
194GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 130
Write 126
Mixed 33.7
114% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.2
83% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY TS 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TS 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback