Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 08:00
Run Duration1091 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 120
60% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 401
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 27
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 37.8
22% 32 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 73 93 90 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 56
Write 71.3
Mixed 56
SusWrite 80.3
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$90
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 176 179 180 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 154
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 177
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 149 159 160 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 159
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 153
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
891GB free
Firmware: MKAOA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 109 109 111 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 107
Write 99.7
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 110
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 88%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 109 109 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 129
Write 127
Mixed 77
SusWrite 111
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 95.5
Write 86.7
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 37.2
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 98.5
Write 87
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 37.1
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 107%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 6.7 4.2 3.3 2.5 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 174
Write 134
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 4.8
115% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 73%
WL3000GS A6472E 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 112 113 113 109 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 142
Write 138
Mixed 99
SusWrite 111
164% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
146% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 65%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.2 1.9 0.9 0.8 1.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 140
Write 142
Mixed 75
SusWrite 1.6
111% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 54%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00AZ6B0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 114 114 110 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
Read 126
Write 126
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 113
151% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback