Asrock Z77 Professional

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Professional  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateAug 31 '18 at 12:30
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 103
2-Core 193
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 516
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$40
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 308 307 308 309 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 449
Mixed 420
SusWrite 309
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 52.3
166% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 365
275% 369 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
656GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 92 86 85 83 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 53.8
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 86.5
50% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 114%
HGST 320GB
84GB free, PID 1012
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 21 13 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.53% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 13
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 17
17% 12 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Professional Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $553
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback