Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151215
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 06:44
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 124
52% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 445
60% 446 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 41.7
33% 37.6 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 36.7
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7OA840
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 136
Mixed 68
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
813GB free
Firmware: CC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 200
Write 116
Mixed 81.2
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
277GB free
Firmware: CC4H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,186
Write 18
Mixed 36
535% 747 MB/s
4K Read 240
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
10,203% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
9GB free, PID 005b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25
Write 9
Mixed 5.2
13% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%
Multiple Card Reader 4GB
4GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10.8
Write 7.7
Mixed 11.2
12% 9.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 14%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 3TB
582GB free, PID 50a5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2608
Write 16.5
Mixed 28
596% 884 MB/s
4K Read 261
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.8
1,064% 88 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 01BA 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 8502 PSD34G16002 8502 PSD34G16002 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback