Fujitsu CELSIUS R640

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R640  (all builds)
MotherboardTyan D1808
Memory12.8 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '18 at 15:36
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5335
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 43.1
15% 32.8 Pts
4-Core 76.9
8-Core 84.5
11% 80.7 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 33% Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5600
Nvidia(10DE 0409) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 8.38
Parallax 2.94
7% 6.47 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 6.43
5% 6.65 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 8.6 9.9 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 13.9
13% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 35%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
258GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 69 72 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 73.3
Write 62.4
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 69.6
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 69%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
200GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 17 17 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 37.4
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 21.3
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R640 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback