Asrock Z77 Extreme11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme11  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '18 at 01:12
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 67
2-Core 153
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 493
41% 357 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 111
Parallax 92.6
80% 101 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 93.2
Splatting 96.5
78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 250GB
120GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 293 341 317 316 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 431
Mixed 414
SusWrite 320
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 45.1
155% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 255
194% 262 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 116%
Ngff to USB3.0 1153E 256GB
128GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 201 205 205 204 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 334
Write 328
Mixed 290
SusWrite 224
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 23.1
66% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 122
98% 137 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 68%
Samsung SSD 860 250GB
150GB free (System drive), PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 31.7
Write 28.2
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 27.3
40% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 6.8
434% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme11 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback