Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateJul 20 '18 at 22:43
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$45
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 565
58% 466 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 37.9
34% 36.8 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 38
Splatting 36.9
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 125 114 111 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 383
Mixed 352
SusWrite 151
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 45.3
163% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 344
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94%
Great: 124%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
369GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 92
Mixed 66
SusWrite 91.3
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
169GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 77.8
Write 96
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 89.6
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 75%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
449GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 39.2
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 39.8
50% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
SSD2go Angelbird 512GB
232GB free, PID 1351
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.6% Good
Read 41.3
Write 37.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 38.5
54% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 14
1,066% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 17.6
DQ Mixed 14.9
1,157% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback