Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '18 at 08:25
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 351
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gigabyte(1458 3618) 2GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 23.5
16% 20.4 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 414
Write 427
Mixed 423
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 7.11
75% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 12.5
39% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
699GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 154
Write 142
Mixed 132
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.27
96% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
772GB free
Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 136
Write 143
Mixed 129
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.24
4K Write 2.55
4K Mixed 0.35
138% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
436GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 104
Mixed 90.5
72% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.44
114% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB
13GB free, PID 1327
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 26.6
Write 17.9
Mixed 15.2
24% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.16
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.49
82% 3.22 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Vulcan 1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $294
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback