Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	15.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160504
Uptime	9.6 Days
Run Date	May 21 '18 at 04:00
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 132 58% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 395 39% 321 Pts	64-Core 416 26% 416 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% XFX(1682 3180) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	5.2% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 7.12 Parallax 6.94 6% 6.95 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 5.13 5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.2% Great: 7%
Nvidia Quadro FX 1400 238 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Nvidia(10DE 0243) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.8 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.27% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.52 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.27% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1,265 Write 920 Mixed 1,047 239% 1,077 MB/s	4K Read 54.6 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 42.8 183% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 90.5 104% 183 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 254%
AMD 2X2 Raid10 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 680GB free Firmware: 1.10 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	266% Outstanding	Read 657 Write 263 Mixed 275 296% 399 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 3.62 4K Mixed 0.6 1,189% 9.85 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 266% Great: 274%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 32GB-$5 2,740 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 9GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 71 Write 26.7 Mixed 29.5 46% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.24 4K Write 0.59 4K Mixed 0.52 50% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 3x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.8% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 11.8 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	29x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16