Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170718
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '18 at 03:30
Run Duration	284 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$110 7,071 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 62.2 1-Core 112 2-Core 246 74% 140 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 743 71% 587 Pts	64-Core 1,314 81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 120GB-$130 2,462 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 17616 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1595 (A6) Unknown 100 100 20 (A7) Unknown 100 100 24 (A8) Unknown 100 100 204 (A9) Unknown 100 100 161 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 87 (AE) Unknown 100 100 96 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 152 652836339747 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 602 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 10954 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4097 (F2) Unknown 253 253 5267 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	57.3% Above average	Read 475 Write 204 Mixed 256 68% 312 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 10.6 84% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26 DQ Write 58.7 DQ Mixed 11.1 17% 32 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 101%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 544GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 70 70 9830 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1418 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 74912 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1394 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 61 488177693 (C2) HDA temperature 69 60 521732127 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 7400498 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 98 2381 (C8) Write error rate 99 99 492 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	58.8% Above average	Read 96.1 Write 109 Mixed 93.2 75% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 58%
313 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Read 11.8 Write 4.53 Mixed 6.03 8% 7.44 MB/s	4K Read 4.51 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.02 18% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47 29,751 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.3 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 18.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	42x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples	7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16