ADD TO PC
BUILD

Compaq RE476AA-ABA SR2050NX NA680

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq RE476AA-ABA SR2050NX NA680 (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Asterope3
Memory	0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '16 at 20:41
Run Duration	490 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98 4,281 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 25.6 2-Core 49.3 17% 37.5 Pts	4-Core 41.5 8-Core 45 6% 43.2 Pts	64-Core 48.8 3% 48.8 Pts
Poor: 15% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.821.0.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.3% Terrible	Lighting 1.43 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 1.69 1% 1.77 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 2.61 2% 1.81 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.3% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2867 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 793 (B1) Unknown 98 98 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 55 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 177 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10971612131	24.7% Poor	Read 106 Write 66.7 Mixed 68.3 18% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 10.7 52% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 25 DQ Mixed 12 12% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 118%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 156GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 197 190 5108 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 926 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1629 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 921 (BE) vendor-specific 52 36 48 (C2) HDA temperature 102 86 48 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.4% Below average	Read 56.4 Write 56 Mixed 31.5 36% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.38 92% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 35%
SanDisk Cruzer 1GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	5.21% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 7.29 Mixed 9.24 13% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.37 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 18% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.21% Great: 8%
USB Disk 0GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 3234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	4.19% Terrible	Read 15 Write 4.73 Mixed 6.96 10% 8.91 MB/s	4K Read 3.45 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.09 18% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 4.19% Great: 6%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback