User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	EVGA 122-CK-NF68
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '18 at 01:31
Run Duration	401 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6600-$90 8,894 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	41% Average	Memory 73.9 1-Core 23 2-Core 52 36% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 51.2 8-Core 48.6 7% 49.9 Pts	64-Core 40.9 2% 40.9 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor 6L250R0 251GB 366 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: BAJ41G20 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 190 180 21612 (04) Start/Stop count 252 252 2583 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 245 244 33665 (09) Power-on hours count 138 138 33184 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 253 253 320 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 40 253 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 219 1354 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 189 15 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 234 234 231 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 252 0	32.1% Below average	Read 51.4 Write 60.1 Mixed 56 42% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.21 68% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 34%
Kingston DT 101 G2 8GB 363 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Read 13.9 Write 3.24 Mixed 4.77 7% 7.32 MB/s	4K Read 2.26 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.004 9% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 6%
WDC WD40 0EB-00CPF0 40GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.3% Very poor	Read 21.1 Write 20.4 Mixed 14.5 23% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.31 52% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.7 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)