Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium U5400 139 User benchmarks, average bench 28% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	27.1% Poor	Memory 46.6 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 43.1 26% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 45.1 8-Core 50.7 6% 47.9 Pts	64-Core 39.7 2% 39.7 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9076) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.2% Terrible	Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.23 fps	MRender 0.38 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.2% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1326 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1356 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 197 197 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 28 (C2) HDA temperature 69 59 176094380063	28.6% Poor	Read 224 Write 134 Mixed 120 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 3.6 38% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.3 DQ Write 19.1 DQ Mixed 4.22 7% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 93%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 3GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	5.75% Terrible	Read 30.7 Write 5.84 Mixed 6.39 13% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.09 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.003 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.75% Great: 28%
Generic Flash Disk 1GB 2,763 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.36% Terrible	Read 4.53 Write 1.88 Mixed 1.67 3% 2.69 MB/s	4K Read 1.14 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.01 5% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.36% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 5.6 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16