Asus B85M-G

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '18 at 17:25
Run Duration	332 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	76%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 170 72% 119 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 339 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.5% Below average	Lighting 42.5 Reflection 50.3 Parallax 37.2 35% 43.3 fps	MRender 43.9 Gravity 50 Splatting 52 40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5540 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1770 (B1) Unknown 85 85 71 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 43 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 672 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23362014880	70.8% Very good	Read 479 Write 266 Mixed 117 63% 287 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 20 97% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 94.8 DQ Mixed 36.7 57% 112 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 500GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 212028824 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5085 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 73618697192 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19408 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4786 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 22 22 78 (BE) vendor-specific 68 50 4850122784 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1259 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 74 74 53449 (C2) HDA temperature 32 50 -140737488355296 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -95545842448575 (F1) Unknown 100 253 144064113246 (F2) Unknown 100 253 276864254972	91.8% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 146 Mixed 60.1 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.25 74% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 112%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 1TB 280 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 173GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 43.9 Write 40.6 Mixed 41.9 32% 42.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.17 47% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 65%
Generic USB Flash Disk 16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID 0059 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	4.98% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 7.03 Mixed 9.76 14% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.01 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 1% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.98% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 0707 HU564404EP0200 0707 HU564404EP0200 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.7% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 14.8 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	962x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	787x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	533x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	481x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	403x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	370x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	259x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	164x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	158x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16