Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 28 '18 at 19:15
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 138
59% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 229
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.3% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 65.8
44% 51.5 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 40.7
34% 41.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 1TB
623GB free
Firmware: 6.1
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 87.6
Write 88.1
Mixed 80.7
64% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.45
130% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 105%
Amd-raid Array 5 1TB
438GB free
Firmware: 6.1
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 76.7
Write 80
Mixed 88.6
62% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.81
4K Mixed 0.47
123% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: 6.1
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 91.6
Write 61.8
Mixed 86.1
60% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 3.09
4K Mixed 0.48
138% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 106%
Amd-raid Array 1 499GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 265
Mixed 238
253% 340 MB/s
4K Read 4.56
4K Write 6.97
4K Mixed 1.29
462% 4.28 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 225%
Great: 172%
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB
80GB free
Firmware: 6.1
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 67.9
Write 65.3
Mixed 64.8
50% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.73
4K Mixed 0.43
126% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 96%
WDC WD25 00JD-55HBC0 250GB
187GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 30
Mixed 30.7
40% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.39
67% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AG34G2130U1S 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 18.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 13.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback