HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '18 at 19:54
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 160 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 404 41% 330 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% PNY(196E 119F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.7% Above average	Lighting 68.1 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 60.7 56% 66.1 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 64.7 53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 248GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1968 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 120 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 63 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 36 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2441813232	69.4% Good	Read 268 Write 214 Mixed 220 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 53.9 4K Mixed 37 125% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 95 86% 131 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6207 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 691 (B1) Unknown 99 99 29 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 52 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 108 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16752717475	60.6% Good	Read 266 Write 194 Mixed 239 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 26 102% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 70.8 77% 130 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7EFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7EFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7EFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7EFR8C-PB 50GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	536x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	489x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	273x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	156x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16