User System

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AB1
Memory	5.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110322
Uptime	14.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '17 at 19:52
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165 5,709 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 75.3 42% 62.6 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 183 20% 159 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6255) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 36.5 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 38.3 30% 34.5 fps	MRender 35.6 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 34.5 29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssd2sc48 0G1CS1754D117-53 480GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19362 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 725 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 92 (B1) Unknown 0 0 561 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 38 100 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 134 (C4) Reallocation count 98 98 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 99 (E7) Temperature 97 100 38 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1 (EA) Unknown 0 0 161 (F1) Unknown 0 0 58303 (F2) Unknown 0 0 66158	48.5% Average	Read 258 Write 223 Mixed 240 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 36.5 4K Mixed 15.8 65% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 30 45% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 91%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 165 6566 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9852 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 33 33 48970 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1969 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 1 272 (BC) Unknown 100 1 21475164429 (BE) vendor-specific 69 48 723189791 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 356 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9495 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.1% Above average	Read 84.2 Write 93.5 Mixed 75.9 63% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.13 79% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 63%
Multi Flash Reader 8GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	6.68% Terrible	Read 16.1 Write 11.9 Mixed 9.34 15% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.58 4K Write 0.45 4K Mixed 0.34 33% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.68% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600EL Series 1600EL Series Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.5% Poor	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 10.5 27% 9.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)