Asus CM6650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM6650  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6650
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '17 at 21:06
Run Duration496 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 64
2-Core 121
51% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 181
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Asus(1043 838A) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.03
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.31
4% 5.12 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 5
Splatting 3.57
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 504
Write 348
Mixed 350
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 22.4
111% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 52.3
60% 105 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 154
Mixed 141
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.25
90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 119
Mixed 114
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.28
110% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
984GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 141
Write 139
Mixed 139
106% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.33
91% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
365GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 84.6
71% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 0.28
122% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 101%
ASMT 2105 3TB
2TB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 167
Write 174
Mixed 119
194% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.34
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 70%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 132
Write 131
Mixed 126
166% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.21
60% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 59%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
364GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 123
Write 130
Mixed 72.8
136% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.17
58% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 59%
ASMT 2115 1TB
266GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 37.1
Mixed 12.5
35% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 44%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
42GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 28.4
Mixed 12.8
29% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.24
44% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
6GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 5.35
Mixed 8.07
10% 9.05 MB/s
4K Read 4.42
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.32
44% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6650 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $215
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback