Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 09:20
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 599
69% 538 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.5% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 107
Parallax 110
94% 111 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 100
Splatting 93
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 250GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 6.3 7.2 7.1 5 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 330
Write 235
Mixed 262
SusWrite 14.3
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 10.8
58% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 39.5
DQ Mixed 13.8
15% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 67%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: UJ220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 22 29 33 24 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 338
Write 319
Mixed 298
SusWrite 34.7
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 14.9
73% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 95.9
DQ Mixed 30.6
40% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 55%
Ccboot iSCSI 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 21 29 32 24 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 370
Write 311
Mixed 270
SusWrite 34.1
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 11.3
60% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 27.4
DQ Mixed 13.5
13% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 12.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 13.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback