Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5757M APU 1,325 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	21.4% Poor	Memory 36.8 1-Core 14.3 2-Core 23 18% 24.7 Pts	4-Core 37.4 8-Core 35.7 5% 36.6 Pts	64-Core 30.5 2% 30.5 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G 4,043 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1297 2064) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	4.95% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 7.8 Parallax 6.3 5% 6.73 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 6.7 5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen01sm21ar128sdk 128GB 128GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 40 52 43 53 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 310 Write 72.4 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 61.7 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 11 39% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 87.1 DQ Write 75.8 DQ Mixed 50.7 46% 71.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 86%
WD WD5000LPSX-75A6WT0 500GB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 194GB free Firmware: 11087211 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 112 121 125 129 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 142 Write 106 Mixed 58.4 SusWrite 122 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.7 204% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown A1_ A1_ 8GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 3.5 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 218 18% 218 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-5757M APUAMDBench 44%, 1,325 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 8650GAMDBench 5%, 4,043 samples	8x

SSD
S3 SSD 256GBVi550Bench 75%, 1,488 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16