Monster TULPAR T7 V20.1

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V20.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.1
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '23 at 18:46
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 119 2-Core 235 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 598 61% 493 Pts	64-Core 747 46% 747 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1D05 1065) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.13% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 92.6 Parallax 8.2 5% 35.6 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 12.1 8% 10 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.13% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 336 284 311 322 332 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 2,100 Write 1,498 Mixed 1,111 SusWrite 334 279% 1,261 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 66.1 215% 74.1 MB/s	DQ Read 952 DQ Write 656 DQ Mixed 829 612% 812 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 249%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 17,082 User benchmarks, average bench 256% 409GB free Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1786 1716 1620 1822 1658 1798 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	278% Outstanding	Read 1,860 Write 1,420 Mixed 1310 SusWrite 1,733 355% 1,581 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 97.9 4K Mixed 60.9 199% 68.2 MB/s	DQ Read 869 DQ Write 732 DQ Mixed 880 637% 827 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 278% Great: 332%
Maxtor OneTouch 2TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 591GB free, PID 7310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 39.1 Write 40.5 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 40.5 53% 39 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 86% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.5% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 12.7 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 10.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.1 Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.1

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	141x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	84x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	57x

SSD
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $33Bench 190%, 20,095 samples	30x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 199%, 3,806 samples	17x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	8x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	52x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	49x
F4 DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 1,403 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $33

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16