Lenovo 20ANS0C90D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20ANS0C90D  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ANS0C90D
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210716
Uptime19 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 17:05
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Memory 19.2
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 118
31% 62.3 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 160
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 82.4
5% 82.4 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 4.1
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 110 70 44 73 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 280
Write 118
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 72.4
26% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 45.6
70% 132 MB/s
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 9
28% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX3M1A1600C10 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 4.2
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 326
12% 326 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback