Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion GQ608AA-AB9 a6115.pt (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Nettle2
Memory	1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070905
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '17 at 20:56
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+-$84 2,640 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	34.3% Below average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 34.7 2-Core 32.4 33% 43.4 Pts	4-Core 34.8 8-Core 34 5% 34.4 Pts	64-Core 30.6 2% 30.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 2A61) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 307.83 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.CH Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	36% Below average	Read 66.2 Write 59.1 Mixed 62.7 47% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.41 94% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 42%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 255GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 23 Mixed 22.2 29% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.27 45% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 1024, 512, 512 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 4.8 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 3.8 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16