Samsung 930MBE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 930MBE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP930MBE-K04US
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 04:32
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 46.8
2-Core 67.7
28% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 237
25% 201 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 29% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Sanyo(144D C176) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 7
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.3
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sn520 SDAPNUW-512G-1004 512GB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20300004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 559 545 654 573 621 626 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 604
Write 479
Mixed 479
SusWrite 596
121% 540 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 26.6
87% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 175
137% 190 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EC-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 6
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 2.1
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 583
7% 583 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930MBE Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 930MBE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback