Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateDec 31 '22 at 12:44
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 92
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 97
56% 84.1 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 150
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8621) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 12.9
1% 4.63 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 11.8
10% 12 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 100 109 104 105 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 180
Write 168
Mixed 152
SusWrite 90.9
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 20.7
70% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 35.6
31% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 104 106 104 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 136
Write 142
Mixed 47
SusWrite 108
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500412AS 500GB
58GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 78 72 78 71 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 68.8
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 73.8
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 12.2
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback